GitLab

Our new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can predict the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to provide it its finest shot. With approximately date news and a little however lively 14 Billion parameter design, our AI is boldly predicting the unpredictable. Join us as we try to respond to mankind's toughest questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain numerous pushing concerns that are less simple to select. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has actually been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be better at forecasting the future (and have actually seen some appealing enhancements - term paper incoming). This week we turned its cold, utahsyardsale.com determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion parameter model which is really on the smaller side. (Some estimates recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION specifications and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from many months ago so we have actually developed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified territory to make its finest forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following concerns to our AI and assessed its reaction. While we have actually seen prediction improvements from our training, utilize these estimates for prop betting at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity

And so it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, however a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal ...

First, I'll take a look at the bottom lines from the posts. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor given that 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been supportive of his profession, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her family and friends to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are excited, morphomics.science while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly given remarks Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship private and not resolving the speculation straight.

I think the essential points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial occasion, the odds and his reactions suggest it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd approximate a low probability, maybe around 5%, considering all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its just a various front-tush being pressed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Appears like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this video game.

Alright, I'm attempting to find out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to comprehend exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it appears like it's a strategy where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the relocation. The post points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is quite high. ... I likewise require to think about the protective methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are aware of the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they may adjust their defense accordingly, which could either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than 5 looks like a considerable number but possible offered their self-confidence, I would approximate a probability around 60-70% chance. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the method, and the possibility that they'll use it a number of times, particularly if it's effective early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime show performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI might not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling back and forth, however in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a fight.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement during a previous halftime program when Trump was present in 2018. That appears substantial since it shows he's done it previously, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more current posts, it discusses that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That could imply he's less likely to attend to Trump this time.

However, he's likewise involved in a feud with Drake, which may offer him reasons to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a character assassination fit from Drake, so possibly he bewares about consisting of any controversial tunes in the performance. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent occasion, Lamar may feel forced to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements throughout the halftime show, so there's a threat that such content might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making bold moves on huge stages. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which might give him more imaginative liberty. Plus, his past habits suggests he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public performances.

But I likewise keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could indicate he's less motivated to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, current shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the event's context-the likelihood appears to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: library.kemu.ac.ke 25% chance

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the reality that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its forecast? Appears like theres somewhat of a possibility that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't suggest to cause which he in fact discovered it humorous himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which may show he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Looking at the articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and loves cheeseburgers. There's a post particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who takes pleasure in eating, especially with his team. So, if there were strategies to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the circumstance is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% chance

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't deceive the devices !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been predicting the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and thinks anything can happen when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to determine the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historic information that may affect this prediction.

First, I review the posts offered. They all discuss the historical data of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has actually come up regularly than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, but it's not a huge difference.

However, I bear in mind that the result of a coin toss is typically thought about random. The slight historical edge for tails could be due to possibility. But when making predictions, in some cases people weigh historic information even if it's not statistically significant. So, I should consider whether this historical predisposition should influence the probability.

After considering it, I decide that while the historical data reveals a minor preference for tails, it's not statistically considerable adequate to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the slight historical edge exists but does not override the truth that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% possibility

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely believe the same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI states the chances are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of articles that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful hire current games, specifically the AFC National championship. That does seem to stimulate some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get irritated when their team loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "outrageous" and "ridiculous." They say there's no proof of systematic predisposition. That's a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they're denying it, it may suggest there's no real basis or they would have addressed it in a different way if there was some truth to it.

Taking a look at the articles, several sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise pointed out that statistical analysis does not show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said information shows the Chiefs have been punished more since 2022. That's interesting because if they were getting special treatment, you might expect less penalties, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the possibility that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably really low. Maybe not zero because you can't rule out every possibility, however very not likely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth seeing the game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the game ends up before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for an excellent video game! And hi, if it ends up our AI was wrong about everything, at least it can gain from this.